User talk:AmericanXplorer13

Image copyright problem with Image:Jimwife5.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jimwife5.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:54, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Marine_One_Air.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Marine_One_Air.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MECU≈talk 23:33, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Code sm.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Code sm.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 19:56, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:AmericanXplorer13.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:AmericanXplorer13.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MECU≈talk 22:10, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Royal Stables.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Royal Stables.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 15:58, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Eagles 24/7 (C) 22:04, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Tosh does not own the Daniel Tosh article. You knew very well that vandalizing the page could result in a block based on the template at the top that says it is semi-protected due to vandalism. Eagles 24/7 (C) 22:11, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unblock|Daniel Tosh said on tonight's tosh.0 that he wanted people to edit his page. I felt that since it was his page, this would be okay. If you look at the other pages I've worked on, this is the only thing I've done wrong. Please consider unblocking my account. I know what I did was wrong, but don't you think that an indefinite ban for a first time offense is a little much? I didn't change or erase any information on the page. I've even fixed pages that were vandalized and hadn't been caught. By all means, you can leave me banned, but I would really like this ban to expire sometime. I'm sorry. Thanks, AmericanXplorer13 (talk) 22:07, 20 October 2010 (UTC)}}[reply]

I do agree with Eagles - vandalizing an article at any time, even if the subject of the article tells you to, is not acceptable here. However, I do also agree with you that an indefinite block seems more than unnecessary at this point, especially given that you have made constructive edits in the past. I'm willing to unblock you, (granted that Eagles is ok with it), with the understanding that you not vandalize any further articles. Regardless of what the TV says. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 02:15, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Eagles247 has agreed to allow you to be unblocked. However, as I said, please be aware than vandalism, whatever the reasons for it, is not acceptable here, and any more vandalism will result in another indefinite block without further warning. You should be able to edit now, but please let me know if you have any problems.

Request handled by: Hersfold ^(t/a/c)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

moss image

Hello - I'm not a moss or plant expert, so I can't give you any info on species etc, but it looks to me like you have a single species of moss which is sporulating. The rest of the items appear to be leaf litter and a sprouting vascular plant of some sort. Regards. de Bivort 17:38, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Green Iguana

That is an outstanding picture. It really captures a lot of character in the animal. Let me know if you need my support in getting it featured. Great work. It would make a great infobox picture on either the Iguana page or the Green iguana page.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 07:28, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Hi AmericanXplorer 13! Thanks for supporting my featured picture candidate, although judging by the recent barrage of opposition I'm guessing it's going to get shot down :(. I read your profile and I found that we share many similarities! I also own a Canon EOS Rebel XS (although I sold the 18-55 kit lens and bought myself a Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 VC). I also like 3D Computer Graphics, and I have also used Autodesk 3ds Max although I now primarily use Rhinoceros 3D for modeling. I'm also 17 years old, which seems to be more or less the same age as you (since your username contains "13" and you said you have been on Wikipedia for over 4 years), although after skipping some grades I'm currently studying in university. Purpy Pupple (talk) 09:04, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Purpy Pupple

I have raised concerns about your account here. J Milburn (talk) 13:32, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ribbon Rewards

AmEx, for creating new ribbons for all to use and enjoy, I award you the following:

		The Original Barnstar
		For creating at least 2 ribbons for the Wiki. NielsenGW (talk) 04:03, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		For creating at least 5 new ribbons for the Wiki. NielsenGW (talk) 04:03, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For creating at least 8 new ribbons for the Wiki. NielsenGW (talk) 12:17, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

		The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
		For creating at least 12 new ribbons for Wikipedia. NielsenGW (talk) 12:17, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

		The Special Barnstar
		For going above and beyond the call, creating 28 new award ribbons for all to use, AmX, you are awarded this special barnstar for your extraodrinary contributions to the Wiki! NielsenGW (talk) 13:43, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reward Board Uganda

		The Editor's Barnstar
		For a very nice job on the Bunyoro Article Skibden (talk) 09:49, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		For a very nice job on the Aide-de-Camp Article Skibden (talk) 09:49, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Protactinium

I am expanding this article for WP:DYK, thus not sure its a good timing for peer review. Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 02:39, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am not yet at the required 5x expansion level (the draft is on my computer), and don't have a good idea for the hook yet. Materialscientist (talk) 02:44, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SVG

I saw you where interested in SVGs maybe you like to review this FP nomination that's a SVG, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Ecchi Spongie555 (talk) 08:42, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Trapped in Amber

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status

Your image, File:Amber2.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Jujutacular ^talk 04:34, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Common foxes in the snow.jpg

The image is now used- perhaps you'd like to reconsider? J Milburn (talk) 00:26, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost's "F and A" page

Hi, I wonder whether you'd be prepared to judge the new FPs for next week. It would just require up to about 140 words nominating your choice and giving your technical/subjective reasons for it. Here's an example. Please let me know, and you want to do it, I'll link you to the draft when it's done, Saturday. Tony (talk) 14:23, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, how's next week? But it might be postponed if there aren't enough, or if people are too preoccupied with the holiday. I could let you know. Tony (talk) 03:41, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are enough already, but if there aren't too many extras, that would work. Tony (talk) 03:50, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

But given that last year there were quite a lot in the week before the holiday, I'm trying to find another person for this week, assuming you can do next week. Tony (talk) 04:00, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The "window" of promotions is from the Saturday to the Friday before publication, midnight end UTC. So it would mean doing it Saturday or Sunday US east-coast time, possibly Monday if early in your day. Is that possible? Tony (talk) 05:41, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I meant Saturday 25 or Sunday 26 December. Tony (talk) 11:51, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there are only six promotions, so what about a combined judgement next weekend? Hehe, sorry, it's not usually this convoluted. Tony (talk) 03:36, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good! --AmericanXplorer13 (talk) 04:36, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

Wishing you a very Merry Christmas & Happy New Year!
Wishing you all the very best for the season. Thanks for all your help and support this year.
Merry Christmas and may Santa be good to you! – SMasters (talk) 04:02, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Click to play!

"Proof" of Pythagorean theorem

I reverted your animation in two places. I can't see how it's a proof, or anything but an illustration that 5 squared is equal to 3 squared plus 4 squared. Dicklyon (talk) 05:35, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, definitely not a "proof". The word "demonstrates" might be better. I have reworded the image description and the caption in pythagorean triple. However, the picture is, in my opinion, somewhat useful to introduce the concept to people unfamiliar with mathematics. Relevant discussion here. Purpy Pupple (talk) 06:18, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Bioluminescence

Howdy! Thanks for the nomination. I didn't have a set of diopters in my kit then, and just couldn't get close enough, so the 1MP image is a heavy crop. You can see the original here:

http://resourceroom.org/IMG_5643_denoise.jpg

http://resourceroom.org/IMG_5643.cr2

I think it's a flawed image, to be honest, but I hope to get something feature-worthy next time around.

Here are a few others: http://resourceroom.org/Foxfire

And yes, the exposure really was eight minutes. You basically prep the camera, start the exposure, spend eight minutes motionless, wait another eight minutes for the camera to finish its "dark" frame, see what you got, and try it again. It glows for about a month each fall, and you can take around 20 shots before the sun rises.

All the best,

Ylem (talk) 22:37, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Hard Drive Head Crash

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted

Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Hard disk head crash.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Makeemlighter (talk) 01:39, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Panellus Stipticus

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted

Your nomination for featured picture status, File:PanellusStipticusAug12 2009.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Makeemlighter (talk) 16:39, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

United States Bill of Rights has been selected as the United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month for June 2011

As one of the editors who has made improvements to the United States Bill of Rights article recently this notice has been left to inform you that it has been selected as the United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month for June 2011. The goal this month is to get this article to Good Article standards or better by July 4th, 2011. You can also vote for next months article of the Month or submit a candidate for article of the month here. --Kumioko (talk) 02:15, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Charlemagnestd2.svg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Charlemagnestd2.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:08, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Americanxplorer13.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Americanxplorer13.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 19:38, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hello,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Amber2.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on July 13, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-07-13. —howcheng {chat} 17:17, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi there,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:PanellusStipticusAug12 2009.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on August 15, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-08-15. —howcheng {chat} 17:06, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Charlemagnestd.svg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Charlemagnestd.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 17:45, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:ChangingGuardsWDC.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:21, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ebola

Hi AmericanXplorer13 did not want to post this on talk.. I live in Africa and we use African time here.. When they say Thursday they don't mention which Thursday. Could be any week. lol Got to love Africa.. Greetings BrianGroen (talk) 18:48, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Brian, ahh, I was thinking of Thursday today, meaning a six (give or take) hour time difference from me. Thanks for letting me know! AmericanXplorer13 (talk) 19:28, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ebola map

That's a great map you've made. Have you changed it to show Texas yet? When you do, will you add it to this article? I would appreciate it. SW3 5DL (talk) 15:35, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I meant to say Liberia. Sorry. Also, can you fix the map here and add your map, too? SW3 5DL (talk) 20:11, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

Great job on updating the map. I just saw it on the U.S. article. And especially as you've got classes. Well done, you. Thanks. SW3 5DL (talk) 21:07, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Research

Please don't bite the newcomers. It would be entirely possible to "research" this edit, including the Spanish language reference, and conclude that the right count is two dead Spanish monks plus one infected nurse (which is an objection to your edit summary, not to your edit). Art LaPella (talk) 05:09, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it's been a long day with unnecessary edits. Those deaths are not counted as Spanish because they were not infected in Spain. They would be counted in the casualties from Africa, I believe. We're using the numbers from the WHO reports. AmericanXplorer13 (talk) 05:24, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Inaccurate Info

If you want to make significant changes, make sure you know what you're doing. Your revision added inaccurate casualty totals and restored an outdated map that had been amended after more up-to-date info became available. -- Veggies (talk) 22:14, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Editing the Ebola map

I am attempting to update this .svg file using Illustrator CS6, and have run into two issues: First, vast areas of the map do not appear to be ungroupable (e.g., most of the countries in Africa are unselectable individually). Secondly, uploading SVG files to Wikimedia generates an error code (and this seems to occur independent of the generating application). Do you have any suggestions?--Раціональне анархіст (talk) 09:13, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bs97107 created.svg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bs97107 created.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 10:44, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Ax13june.jpg

The file File:Ax13june.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned file, no foreseeable use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:02, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Test12345.svg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Test12345.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jonteemil (talk) 02:49, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tes4t1.svg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tes4t1.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jonteemil (talk) 02:50, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:AlternateBefreiungshalle.jpg

The file File:AlternateBefreiungshalle.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused crop of File:Befreiungshalle Hall of Liberation Kelheim.jpg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:29, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Capitol DC.jpg

The file File:Capitol DC.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Low quality. Superseded by files at c:Category:United States Capitol at night.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:14, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]